Co

Different generations of co-op owners are at odds over upgrades, fees Old, new residents often have opposing views about the future of their buildings

Southridge Cooperative Section 1 at 3325 90th Street in Queens

New York City co-op residents are increasingly butting heads over whether or not shelling out cash for revamps and improvements is worth it.

In many cases, the crux of the conflict is a generational divide: Long-term residents and those who recently moved in often have very different income l上海千花社区

上海千花网交友
evels. The issue is more concentrated in gentrifying areas.

Those who purchased in the building some 30 years ago may not have the means to shoulder the cost of extra fees and upgrades. According to data from appraisal firm Miller Samuel , the average monthly 上海千花网龙凤论坛

上海千花社区
maintenance charges at Manhattan co-ops have ballooned by 32.9 percent since 2008, to $1.94 a square foot from $1.46.

At Southridge Cooperative Section 1 in Jackson Heights, for example, the board voted two years ago to undertake an $120,00 upgrade of the building. But not everyone thought the changes which created an extra residents bathroom, a library nook and connected the two lobbies was needed, the New York Times reported.

“The changes are very very nice, but did we really need to spend the money?” Larry Wilkes, a Southridge co-op board member who paid less than $25,000 for his one-bedroom in 1992, told the Times. “I don’t feel 上海贵族宝贝交流区

上海贵族宝贝论坛
that this place 爱上海龙凤419桑拿

上海龙凤论坛sh1f
needs a glorious library. I spend less than a minute in the lobby, it doesn’t need to be the Taj Mahal.”

Unrenovated one-bedrooms at the co-op now sell for around $200,000. Wilkes told the paper a “plethora” of younger people “hankering for more facilities” is driving up costs at the building.

In terms 爱上海同城对对碰

爱上海同城论坛
of new development, co-ops are certainly declining in New York City. Earlier this year, The Real Deal found that developers had filed just 75 plans for new co-op projects since 2000. [NYT] Miriam Hall

Tags: co-ops, gentrification
We are having some technical difficulties. Try again later.

By clicking Subscribe you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tags: